Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Author Ed Anderson's avatar

I’m not sure I can add anything that David and RJ haven’t.

I recognized Samuel Little’s name but I have to wonder if it’s because as a true crime writer I’m always a little more attuned, as you know.

Expand full comment
RJ Sykes's avatar

This is something I have often asked myself: why do certain stories receive so much media attention, while others, similar in respect if not much worse, receive far less attention? Because they don't fit the bill, they don't support whatever agenda the powers that be want to establish. And stories that are blown out of proportion, oversensationalized, and capitalize on fear, deserve far closer scrutiny. In the case of Dahmer, it so happened that Milwaukee had (and still has) a very disproportionate share of homicides in Wisconsin. And dare I say it, the majority of victims are black and so are the perpetrators. The story brought national attention to a very real issue, albeit, in the worst way possible. In what was a presidential election year at the time (1992), the winning party had a manifesto embedded in tackling crime and inequalities amongst minority groups. Politicians used the story to leverage their campaigns, and it also distracted the public from the very real problem of church abuse (several key players in the case were closely tied to and even defended accused priests). So, who benefited from the whole spectacle? Quite a few people did. Anthony Sowell was deserving of the same kind of frantic attention. But that would be giving the 'wrong' message.

Expand full comment
6 more comments...

No posts