Is the case as clear-cut as the media would like us to think?
If he is autistic, that should not be used as evidence against him in a trial.
It shouldn’t, but the question is if his odd behaviour can be attributed to ASD should it be used, when it could quite easily also be behaviour because potentially he is guilty. It is a real tough question.
If he is autistic, that should not be used as evidence against him in a trial.
It shouldn’t, but the question is if his odd behaviour can be attributed to ASD should it be used, when it could quite easily also be behaviour because potentially he is guilty. It is a real tough question.